Oregon State Bar Bulletin — JANUARY 2015

The Legal Writer

"C" Change:
Compelling Compliments and Confrontations
By Suzanne E. Rowe

An attorney told me recently that a judge called his argument “compelling but not coercive.” The attorney lost the argument and the case, but was still baffled days later because, in his mind, compelling and coercive were synonyms. Hoping to alleviate his bafflement, I went diving into the “C” section of my favorite dictionary.1 As always, I was distracted multiple times by fascinating words.

Can vs. May

Elementary school teachers in my rural hometown were committed to the difference between can and may. Whenever I asked, “Can I go to the playground?” the teacher responded, “I don’t know. Can you?” The teachers were emphasizing the difference between ability (can) and permission (may). Once I asked the correct question, “May I go to the playground?” the answer was often “Yes, you may!”

My favorite dictionary maintains the distinction between can and may all these years later, although many of us casually use the words interchangeably. Moreover, may is the more polite and more formal way to make a request or to grant permission, meaning that it’s the more appropriate word to use in legal documents and formal settings.

Cannot vs. Can Not

One word or two? Either cannot or can not is acceptable, but the one-word version is more common. The two-word version works best in forms like “not only . . . but also,” where not is part of the form. In other words, the not should be decoupled from can when it’s part of another form. For example, “The judge can not only dismiss the frivolous case, but also impose sanctions.”

Canon vs. Cannon

These words fall into a category my colleague Megan McAlpin calls “tricky homophones.”2 These are words that sound the same, but have different spellings and different meanings. A canon is a rule or principle. Remember canonical law from the first two days of Civil Procedure? A cannon is a big piece of artillery used to blow to bits the people who aren’t following the canons that you prefer.

Case vs. Case vs. Case

The problem here is not that we don’t understand the many definitions of the word case. We all know that it can mean a particular situation (“in that case, let’s leave early”), a disease (“one case of Ebola can devastate a family”), a legal action (“she won the Martinez case”), the style of a letter (“use an upper case P”) or a grammatical form of a noun or pronoun. (Astute readers noted immediately the absence of an example for the last definition of case. If I remembered my high school Latin lessons better, I’d provide an example. Sadly, I can barely recall the terms “nominative” and “accusative.”)

The challenge arises when we use the single word case to mean multiple things in the same sentence. The following sentence uses casein three ways: “In case multiple cases of Ebola appear in New Jersey, a case will likely be filed against the governor.” Try to rewrite the sentence to avoid using case to mean more than one thing. “If multiple cases of Ebola appear in New Jersey, a suit will likely be filed against the governor.”


A casebook is “a torture device inflicted on law students.” Oops, no, that was just my experience as a 1L.

Cabal vs. Cable

These words are nothing alike, except that your word processor might autocorrect one for the other if you slip a bit while typing. A cabal is “a secret political clique or faction.” A cable is a thick rope that holds up sails and pulls cars out of ditches.

Cache vs. Cachet

You might use both cache and cachet in one document, but one little key stroke changes the meaning completely. A cache is a hidden collection, say of ancient documents, gold coins or weapons. The cache might have cachet, meaning prestige, if other folks admire those documents, coins or weapons.


Catch-22 describes “a dilemma or difficult circumstance from which there is no escape because of mutually conflicting or dependent conditions.” In the book by the same title, the catch-22 is that flying combat missions is something any sane person would avoid. Pretending to be insane would disqualify a person from having to fly the missions. But trying to avoid the missions is proof of sanity. The problem is logically impossible to solve. In daily life, my catch-22 is that I can’t find my glasses, but without my glasses I can’t see to find them. Many recent law graduates face a catch-22: they lack the work experience needed to be hired.

Celsius vs. Centigrade

Those of us living in undeveloped nations that do not employ commonly used scientific weights, measures and temperatures might use Celsius and centigrade interchangeably. The first is the standard; use Celsius when giving temperatures that will be understandable to people from most other nations. For example, you might write to your friends in Mexico, France and Zambia that you consider 20 degrees Celsius the perfect temperature for a warm summer day. (For readers from undeveloped nations, that translates into 68 degrees Fahrenheit, which this native Floridian considers freezing.)

Censor vs. Censure

Both of these words are negative, but in different ways. Censor means taking out objectionable material. The verb and the noun are the same, so the action taken is to censor and the person who does it is the censor. In contrast, to censure is to “express severe disapproval.” If a politician is censured for inappropriate conduct, the media in this country will not censor the news but spread it widely.


Chocolate is “the standard reward for completing a particularly onerous task or for enduring an especially horrific meeting.” Yes, that one is really and truly in my dictionary.

Classic vs. Classical

The adjective classic denotes an item that has stood the test of time and emerged as an example of excellence. Think of the classic car, the classic blazer and the classic treatise on torts. The adjective classical refers to something from antiquity — for example, classical architecture.

The two words are fun to play around with. Art can be both classic and classical if it is not only excellent and timeless but also related to or influenced by Greek or Roman ideals. A classical education typically requires students to study Latin or Greek. But the study of Latin, Greek and related literature is called the study of “the classics.” Just to the throw a wrench in the works, though, classical music isn’t from antiquity, but from the 18th century.

Complement vs. Compliment

A complement is something that adds to, enhances or completes. An excellent secretary is a complement to an attorney who doesn’t write well and can’t edit worth beans. A compliment is an expression of admiration. The lucky attorney should provide many compliments to the excellent secretary.

Contagious vs. Infectious

Strictly speaking, a contagious disease is spread by physical contact. Ebola is the current example. An infectious disease is spread through the air or water. Influenza and cholera are examples from past crises. Speaking less strictly, the terms contagious and infectious are interchangeable. When speaking figuratively, however, we use either adjective to describe positive things, like contagious laughter or infectious good will (or infectious laughter and contagious good will). But we use only contagious with negatives like the spread of violence (e.g., “the gang’s violent attitude was contagious”).

Continual vs. Continuous

While often mistaken as synonyms, these words are not. Continual refers to repeated instances. Continuous refers to something that never ends. If you had continual meetings all day, you went from one hideous conference room to another. If you had a continuous meeting, you sat in the same hideous conference room for 10 hours. Either way, you deserve chocolate.

Convince vs. Persuade

To convince is to cause someone to believe something. To persuade is to cause someone to do something. The difference is subtle. Even after convincing your opponent that a jury will believe your client, you still have to persuade your opponent to settle.

Compelling vs. Coercive

At last, I arrived at the word pair that had started all of this fun. Pulling a less-favorite dictionary from my shelves, I found compelling defined as “rousing strong interest, attention, conviction or admiration.”3 So the judge was paying the attorney a high compliment for his argument; it was very interesting, possibly even admirable, but that argument did not coerce the judge to decide in favor of my friend’s client.


The title of this article is an obvious play on “sea change.” Shakespeare coined the term in The Tempest, and it means “a profound or notable transformation.” Use these “C” words correctly, and you can transform your writing.



1. The New Oxford American Dictionary (3d ed. 2010) (aka “my favorite dictionary”).

2. Megan McAlpin, Beyond the First Draft: Editing Strategies for Powerful Legal Writing (2014).

3. The Oxford American Dictionary of Current English (1999).

Suzanne E. Rowe is the James L. and Ilene R. Hershner Professor at the University of Oregon School of Law, where she directs the Legal Research and Writing Program.

An archive of  The Legal Writer articles is available here.

© 2015 Suzanne E. Rowe

return to top
return to Table of Contents