Skip to Content
  • Home
  • About the Bar
  • Mission
  • Forms
  • Sitemap
    • Member Directory
      Last Name:
      First Name:
      Bar Number:
      City:


    • Login
OSB Logo

Oregon State Bar Bulletin — MAY 2011

Bar Counsel
What Hath the Web Wrought?
Advertising in the Internet Age
By Amber Hollister

The Internet age is upon us. Firm websites are becoming stylized works of art. Lawyers are listed on LinkedIn, and big firms share space on Facebook. Lawyers are seeking creative opportunities to harness the power of the Web to market and sell legal services.

A Missouri lawyer recently made headlines in the ABA Journal when he offered his firm’s estate planning services on Groupon in a bid to attract new clients. Groupon is one of many “deal-of-the-day” Internet sites, similar to LivingSocial, ideeli and Woot, which offer customers daily discounts on everything from restaurants to spa services. Typically, deal-of-the-day websites ask customers to register and then give them a limited time to purchase a deal-of-the-day online. After the purchase is made, customers may present a voucher to the participating business as payment. Deal-of-the-day services often keep a portion of the proceeds from each deal sold rather than charge the participating business a fee up front.

Although deal-of-the-day sites can be a powerful marketing tool, lawyers should proceed with care.

Paying for Online Advertising
At the outset, lawyers should recognize that Internet-based advertising is governed by the same rules as more traditional print advertising. Lawyers are generally permitted to pay third parties to communicate information about their services on the Internet as long as the communication does not misrepresent a material fact and is not otherwise materially misleading. RPC 7.1(a)(1)-(2); RPC 7.2(b); see also ABA Formal Ethics Opinion No. 10-457 (Lawyer Websites).

In the context of deal-of-the-day offers, lawyers must accurately describe the proposed services in the online offer, and how they calculated the claimed discount. RPC 7.1(a)(1)-(2). They should be clear about the jurisdictional limits of their practice. See OSB Formal Op No 2005-103. They should also be careful to explain that their ability to provide the services promised depends on whether or not a conflict of interest exists under RPC 1.7 or 1.9.

Oregon RPC 7.1(d) permits a lawyer to pay others to disseminate information about the lawyer’s services, to the extent permitted by RPC 7.2. RPC 7.2(a) provides:

A lawyer may pay the cost of advertisements permitted by these rules and may hire employees or independent contractors to assist as consultants or advisors in marketing a lawyer’s or law firm’s services. A lawyer shall not otherwise compensate or give anything of value to a person or organization to promote, recommend or secure employment by a client, or as a reward for having made a recommendation resulting in employment by a client, except as permitted by paragraph (c) [regarding lawyer referral services] or Rule 1.17 [regarding sale of law practice].

RPC 7.2(a) allows lawyers to pay for the actual cost of online advertisements, but not for online recommendations or referrals. OSB Formal Opinion No. 2007-180 explains how advertising may be distinguished from recommendations or referrals: “When services are advertised, the nonlawyer does not physically assist in linking up lawyer and client once the advertising material has been disseminated. When a lawyer’s services are recommended, the nonlawyer intermediary is relied upon to forge the actual attorney and client link.”

Offering services on a deal-of-the-day website will violate Rule 7.2(a) if a lawyer is compensating the website as a reward for having made a recommendation resulting in employment by a client or securing the lawyer’s employment by a client.

Sharing Fees With Online Advertisers
Participating in a deal-of-the day website might also run afoul of the prohibitions against splitting fees with nonlawyers. Lawyers cannot pay advertisers a “share” of the legal fees that result from online advertising. RPC 5.4(a). This is because lawyers are prohibited “from giving a nonlawyer a share of a legal fee in exchange for services related to the obtaining or performance of legal work.” In re Griffith, 304 Or 575, 611, 748 P2d 86 (1978) (interpreting former DR 3-102, which is now RPC 5.4(a)).

Paying for online advertising based on the amount of web user interest does not automatically violate RPC 5.4(a). OSB Formal Opinion 2007-180 distinguishes between an attorney who pays a fixed fee for “hits” or “clicks” on the attorney’s advertising and an attorney who pays a fee based on work derived from an advertisement. The opinion concludes that if the attorney merely pays a fixed fee based on the number of “hits” or “clicks” on the attorney’s Internet ad, the attorney is not engaged in an improper fee-sharing arrangement with a nonattorney. The opinion, however, explains that the conclusion would be different if the fee is related to any particular work derived from the advertising or is based on actual referrals or retained clients. Such an arrangement would be a violation of RPC 7.2(a) and possibly RPC 5.4(a).

Under RPC 5.4(a), whether advertising and selling services on a deal-of-the-day site is permissible will depend to some extent on how a lawyer pays the website for its service. Some deal-of-the-day sites may require the lawyer to allow them to retain a portion of the amount collected or the fee actually earned. According to its website, LivingSocial collects a “commission fee” out of the money collected from the customer. Other deal-of-the-day sites may have different payment procedures. Regardless, offering services on a deal-of-the-day website will violate Rule 5.4(a) if the specific terms of service require the lawyer to pay a fee based on the work derived from the advertising or the number of retained clients.

According to the ABA Journal, the Missouri lawyer who advertised on Groupon maintains that he vetted his participation in Groupon with the Missouri Bar Association. In a sign of the times, the Missouri bar issued a statement through Twitter, clarifying that Missouri ethics authorities have not approved Groupon wholesale. The tweet explained that “Legal Ethics Counsel does not provide advisory opinions on companies” because a “company could operate one way now and differently next week.” The tweet encouraged lawyers to contact the bar for case-by-case advice.

At least one other state bar seems poised to issue an ethics opinion concluding that participating in a deal-of-the-day website would result in illicit fee-sharing. The North Carolina Bar recently issued Draft Proposed Ethics Opinion No. 2010-4, which concludes that where a deal-of-the-day website’s fee is the percentage of each deal sold and the amount paid does not reflect the cost of advertising with the website, it constitutes impermissible fee-sharing with a nonlawyer.

Forming an Attorney-Client Relationship Online
Assuming a lawyer’s participation in a deal-of-the-day website does not amount to illicit fee-sharing or an impermissible referral fee, there are still potential pitfalls. When a customer purchases a deal-of-the-day offer, when and how might that customer become the lawyer’s client?

In Oregon, a lawyer-client relationship can be formed based on a prospective client’s subjective intention to form a lawyer-client relationship if there are objective facts upon which a reasonable person would rely as supporting the existence of a lawyer-client relationship. In re Weidner, 310 Or 757, 770, 801 P2d 828 (1990).

When a lawyer offers to provide legal services at a deal-of-the-day website, and a customer purchases a voucher to pay for those services, the lawyer has laid the foundation for the creation of a lawyer-client relationship. Lawyers should be mindful of the expectations they are creating in the minds of customers. Before undertaking representation, the lawyer will need to determine whether a conflict exists under RPC 1.7 or 1.9. If a conflict prevents a lawyer from providing the services promised, at a minimum, the lawyer will need to issue a refund to the customer. RPC 1.15-1(d).

Even if a lawyer-client relationship is not created, a deal-of-the-day customer “who discusses with a lawyer the possibility of forming a client-lawyer relationship” before or after purchasing a deal is a prospective client who is owed certain duties of confidentiality and loyalty under RPC 1.18.

Conclusion
While the Internet beckons, lawyers should proceed with care to avoid potential ethical traps. Generally, lawyers may advertise and market their services on the Internet in the same way they would utilize print advertising. When doing so, they should ensure all communications about their services are neither false nor misleading, and that they are not sharing their legal fees with nonlawyers. Lawyers should also be cognizant of whether and when they are forming a lawyer-client relationship.

Amber Hollister is deputy general counsel for the Oregon State Bar. She can be reached at (503) 431-6312, or toll-free in Oregon at (800) 452-8260, ext. 312, or by e-mail at ahollister@osbar.org.

Ethics opinions are published and updated on the bar’s website at www.osbar.org/ethics/toc.html.

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Amber Hollister is deputy general counsel for the Oregon State Bar. She can be reached at (503) 431-6312, or toll-free in Oregon at (800) 452-8260, ext. 312, or by e-mail at ahollister@osbar.org.

Ethics opinions are published and updated on the bar’s website here.

An archive of Bar Counsel articles is available here.


© 2011 Amber Hollister

— return to top
— return to Table of Contents

  • For The Public

      Public Legal Information

    • Public Information Home
    • Legal Information Topics
    • Oregon Juror Guide
    • Submit Ethics Complaint

    • Getting Legal Help

    • Finding The Right Lawyer
    • Hiring A Lawyer
    • Lawyers Fees

    • Client Services

    • Client Assistance Office
    • Client Security Fund
    • Fee Dispute Resolution
    • Public Records Request
    • Locating Attorney Files

    • Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    • Public Member Application
  • For Members

    OSB Login

    • Log In To OSB Site
    • Member Account Setup
    • Non-Member Account Setup
    • Reset Password

    OSB Resources

    • Attorney's Marketplace
    • Career Center
    • Events
    • Forms Library
    • Online Resources
    • OSB Group Listings
    • Performance Standards
    • Rules Regulations and Policies
    • Surveys and Research Reports
    • Unclaimed Client Funds
    • Voting Regions and By-City
      County Information

    Fastcase™

    • Log in to Fastcase
    • Overview
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Inactive Member Subscriptions

    Legal Ethics

    • Legal Ethics Home
    • Find an Ethics Opinion
    • Bulletin Bar Counsel Archive

    Company Administrator

    • Company Administrator Home
    • Company Administrator FAQ
    • Authorization Form

    State Lawyers
    Assistance Committee

    • SLAC Info

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Court Information

    • Judicial Vacancies
    • Court Info | Calendars | Jury Info
    • Oregon Attorneys
      in Federal Court
    • Tribal Courts of Oregon

    OSB Publications

    • Bar Bulletin Magazine
    • – Bulletin Archive
    • – Legal Writer Archive
    • Capitol Insider
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter

    PLF Programs

    • (OAAP) Oregon Attorney
      Assistance Program
    • Practice Management Attorneys
    • Malpractice Coverage
  • CLE/Legal Publications

    CLE Seminars

    • CLE Seminars Home
    • Online Seminar Registration
    • General Info/FAQ

    My Account

    • My Content
    • My Events
    • Order History

    Legal Publications

    • Legal Publications Home
    • Log in to BarBooks®
    • BarBooks® FAQ
    • Online Bookstore
    • Legal Pubs Blog
  • Bar Programs

    Diversity & Inclusion

    • Diversity & Inclusion Home
    • Diversity Story Wall
    • D&I Programs
    • ACDI Roster
    • D&I Staff Contacts
    • D&I Links

    Legislative/Public Affairs

    • Legislative Home
    • Committee Contacts
    • Legislative Sessions
    • Staff Contacts
    • Useful Links

    Legal Services Program

    • LSP Home

    Oregon Law Foundation

    • OLF Home
    • Partners in Justice

    Fee Dispute Resolution

    • Fee Dispute Resolution Home

    Pro Bono

    • Pro Bono Home
    • Pro Bono Reporting
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Lawyer Referral and Information Services

    • RIS Login
    • Summary of Referral and Information Services Programs
    • Lawyer Referral Service Info and Registration Forms
    • Modest Means Program Registration Forms
    • Military Assistance Panel Training Info and Registration Form
    • Problem Solvers Registration Form
    • Lawyer To Lawyer Registration Form

    (LRAP) Loan Repayment Assistance Program

    • LRAP Home
    • LRAP FAQ
    • LRAP Policies
  • Member Groups

    Sections

    • Section Info/Websites
    • Joining Sections
    • CLE Registration Services
    • Standard Section Bylaws (PDF)
    • Leadership Resources
    • Treasurers Tools

    Committees

    • Home
    • Leadership Resources
    • Professionalism Commission
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    House of Delegates

    • HOD Home
    • HOD Resources
    • Meetings
    • Rules (PDF)
    • Roster (PDF)
    • Staff Contacts

    Board of Governors

    • BOG Home
    • Meetings & Agendas
    • Members
    • Liaisons
    • Committees
    • Resources
    • Task Forces

    Oregon New Lawyers Division

    • ONLD Home
    • Law Students
    • Student Loan Repayment
    • Committees
    • Upcoming Events

    Task Forces and Special Committees

    • Task Forces Home

    Volunteer Bars

    • List/Contacts
    • Leadership Resources

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities
  • Licensing/Compliance

    Admissions

    • Admissions Home
    • Alternative Admittance
    • Applicants for Admission
    • Admissions Forms
    • Past Bar Exam Results

    Supervised Practice Portfolio Examination

    • SPPE Home

    Licensed Paralegal Program

    • LP Home

    Lawyer Discipline

    • Discipline Home
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter
    • Disciplinary Boards
    • Client Assistance Office
    • (SPRB) State Professional Responsibility Board

    Membership Records

    • Address Changes
    • Good Standing Certificate
    • Request Discipline File Review

    MCLE

    • MCLE Home
    • Program Database
    • Forms
    • Rules (PDF)

    IOLTA Reporting

    • IOLTA Home
    • IOLTA FAQ

    Licensing Fees

    • Licensing Fee FAQ
    • Licensing Fee Payment

    Status Changes

    • Status Changes FAQ
    • Inactive Status Form
    • Retired Status Form
    • Active Pro Bono Status Form
    • Reinstatement Forms
    • Resignation Form A
    • Pending Reinstatements

    Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    Pro Hac Vice/Arbitration

    • Pro Hac Vice
    • Arbitration

    New Lawyer Mentoring Program

    • New Lawyer Mentoring Program Home

    Professional Liability Fund

    • Professional Liability
      Fund Website
For The Public

Public Information Home
Legal Information Topics
Oregon Juror Guide
Finding The Right Lawyer
Hiring A Lawyer
Lawyers Fees
Client Assistance Office
Public Records Request
Unlawful Practice of Law
Fee Dispute Resolution
Client Security Fund
Volunteer Opportunities
for the Public

For Members

BarBooks®
Bulletin Archive
Career Center
Fastcase™
Judicial Vacancies
Legal Ethics Opinions
OSB Group Listings
OSB Login
OSB Rules & Regs
SLAC Info
Surveys and Reports
Volunteer Opportunities

CLE/Legal Pubs

CLE Seminars Home
Legal Publications Home

Bar Programs

Diversity & Inclusion
Fee Arbitration/Mediation
Legal Services Program
Legislative/Public Affairs
Loan Repayment
Assistance Program

Oregon Law Foundation
Pro Bono

Member Groups

Board of Governors
Committees
House of Delegates
Volunteer Bars
Oregon New
Lawyers Division

OSB Sections
Professionalism
Commission

Volunteer Opportunities

About The Bar

About the Bar
ADA Notice
Contact Info
Copyright Notice
Directions to the Bar
Meeting Room Rentals
Mission Statement
OSB Job Opportunities
Privacy Policy
Staff Directory
Terms of Use

Licensing/Compliance

Admissions
Client Assistance Office
Client Security Fund
IOLTA Reporting
Lawyer Discipline
MCLE
Member Fee FAQ
New Lawyer
Mentoring Program

Professional Liability Fund
Status Changes

Oregon State Bar Center

Phone: (503) 620-0222
Toll-free in Oregon: (800) 452-8260
Facsimile: (503) 684-1366

Building Location:
16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Mailing Address:
PO Box 231935
Tigard, OR 97281

Oregon State Bar location Map

Copyright ©1997 Oregon State Bar  ®All rights reserved | ADA Notice | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use