Skip to Content
  • Home
  • About the Bar
  • Mission
  • Forms
  • Sitemap
    • Member Directory
      Last Name:
      First Name:
      Bar Number:
      City:


    • Login
OSB Logo
Oregon State Bar Bulletin — AUGUST 2003

Bar Counsel

CHANGING THE RULES
Rewriting our DRs, Part II
By Sylvia E. Stevens

In January 2003, the Board of Governors released the report of the Special Legal Ethics Committee on Disciplinary Rules ('the Rules Committee') for consideration by the membership. The report recommended that the bar replace the Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility with a new set of rules derived from the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct.

Through the Bulletin, the OSB website and broadcast e-mail messages, the Board of Governors invited comments from members about the proposed Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct. In March and April, representatives of the Rules Committee held open forums in each region of the state to explain and discuss the proposal. In May and June, the Rules Committee met to review the comments received and to make final adjustments to the proposed ORPC.

On June 14, 2003, the Board of Governors accepted the Final Report of the Rules Committee and voted to put the proposal on the agenda for the OSB House of Delegates on Sept. 20, 2003. The board made a few additional 'housekeeping' changes to the proposal at its Aug. 1 meeting.

The Rules Committee received about two dozen written comments from individual members during the comment period. In addition, two groups, the Solo and Small Firm Practice Section and the Oregon District Attorneys Association, responded on behalf of their members. With only a few specific exceptions, most of the comment received was favorable; no one suggested that the Oregon Code should be retained, and many were very positive about joining the 44 other jurisdictions that have some version of the Model Rules.

The Rules Committee considered thoroughly all of the comments and suggestions received but ultimately made only a few changes in the proposal. Most of the changes were minor technical corrections or involved the addition of a few words to enhance clarity. Some of the suggestions and comment received related to the substance of limitations and prohibitions in existing rules; the Rules Committee declined to address those, because its charge was limited to determining whether to retain Oregon’s existing rule or adopt the corresponding or new Model Rule. The Rules Committee did not believe it had authority to recommend substantive changes in Oregon’s lawyer regulation.

The most vigorous opposition to any rule (and that which generated the most substantive change) came from the Oregon District Attorneys Association, its member district attorneys, the Oregon Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney, all of whom voiced opposition to the adoption of Model Rule 3.8 Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor. The Model Rule has six subparts: (a) prohibits prosecution without probable cause; (b) requires reasonable efforts to ensure that the accused is advised of his or her rights; (c) prohibits efforts to obtain a waiver of important pretrial rights from an unrepresented person; (d) requires disclosure of exculpatory and mitigating evidence at trial and sentencing; (e) prohibits subpoenaing privileged information from lawyers except where the information is essential to the prosecution and not otherwise available and (f) prohibits extrajudicial statements by a prosecutor that are likely to heighten public condemnation of the accused and requires reasonable care to prevent nonlawyers associated with the case from making statements the prosecutor is prohibited from making. Although MR 3.8(a)-(d) and the last part of (f) is the rule in 44 jurisdictions (subsections (e) and the first part of (f) are adopted in only about 10 jurisdictions), the ODAA argued that the proposed rule was impossible to comply with, inconsistent with Oregon law, contrary to public policy, beyond the prosecutors’ ability to control and would have a chilling effect on their role as legal advisors to law enforcement. After consideration of the ODAA comments, the Rules Committee voted to delete paragraphs (e) and (f) of proposed Rule 3.8 and modified (c) to clarify that it does not apply to persons appearing pro se or who have waived their rights to counsel and silence.

Another change made by the committee was in response to a suggestion by the U.S. Attorney and some others regarding Rule 4.2 Communication with Person Represented by Counsel. Rather than adopt ABA Model Rule 4.2, the Rules Committee had recommended retaining the DR 7-104 formulation, which prohibits a lawyer from communicating with a represented person on the subject of the representation or on directly related subjects. DR 7-104 is very similar to MR 4.2, which has been widely adopted. No other jurisdiction, however, has the 'directly related subjects' language. That was added to Oregon’s rule in 1984 in response to a court decision broadly defining the subject matter of a representation. The Rules Committee agreed with the commentors that the 'directly related' language adds nothing to the rule as it has been interpreted in Oregon and elsewhere and is more confusing than helpful, and voted to delete that phrase from the rule.

The amended proposal also does not include proposed Rule 6.1 Voluntary Pro Bono Publico Service. After discussion, the Rules Committee adopted the view of several members that the disciplinary rules should not include aspirational standards.

The Rules Committee carefully considered a suggestion from the Oregon Attorney General regarding proposed Rule 5.3 Responsibilities Regarding Nonlawyer Assistants, but declined to make any change. The rule requires a lawyer to exercise reasonable care to assure that the conduct of nonlawyers who assist in the rendition of the lawyer’s services is compatible with the professional obligations of the lawyer if the lawyer supervises or exercises managerial control over or ratifies the conduct of nonlawyers 'employed or retained by or associated with' the lawyer. The Attorney General expressed concern over the meaning of the terms 'associated with' and 'ratifies,' suggesting that they could make a lawyer responsible for the conduct of a nonlawyer even if the lawyer exercises no control, does not encourage the nonlawyer to engage in the conduct and the conduct is otherwise lawful. The Rules Committee found no evidence in any reported cases to validate those concerns and ultimately concluded that the meaning and scope of the rule is sufficiently clear by its plain language and as explicated in the official comment to the Model Rules and other authorities.

The final proposal of the Rules Committee includes the newest version of Model Rule 1.13 Organization as Client, as amended by the ABA House of Delegates on Aug. 12, 2003. This rule in its current form has no counterpart in the Oregon Code, but is recommended by the Rules Committee as being very helpful guidance on the obligations of lawyers who represent corporations and other organizations. The ABA’s recent amendments were a response to public criticism of lawyers following the collapse of several large publicly-traded companies, the adoption of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and at the suggestion of the ABA Task Force on Corporate Responsibility. The Rules Committee favored the new version, finding it a clear directive to lawyers about fulfilling their obligations to entity clients.

The proposed new rules retain much of Oregon's existing code, often verbatim. It also includes some rules that are new to Oregon, including Rule 1.13, discussed above; Rule 1.18 regarding duties to prospective clients; Rule 4.4(b) requiring return of inadvertently sent documents; Rule 5.2(b) exonerating a subordinate lawyer who engages in misconduct at the direction of a supervising lawyer; and Rule 5.5 allowing temporary practice in Oregon by out-of-state lawyers.

The final report of the Rules Committee and the proposed Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct with explanatory committee notes are in the agenda packet for the September 2003 OSB House of Delegates meeting. They are also available on the OSB website at www.osbar.org. Members are encouraged to review the proposal and convey your views to one of your House of Delegates representatives. Members are also encouraged to attend the 2003 House of Delegates meeting and participate in the debate and discussion of this important change for Oregon lawyers.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sylvia E. Stevens is assistant general counsel of the Oregon State Bar. Additional information can be obtained by contact her at (800) 431-6359 (inside Oregon) or (503) 431-6359 (outside Oregon).

© 2003 Sylvia E. Stevens


— return to top
— return to Table of Contents

  • For The Public

      Public Legal Information

    • Public Information Home
    • Legal Information Topics
    • Oregon Juror Guide
    • Submit Ethics Complaint

    • Getting Legal Help

    • Finding The Right Lawyer
    • Hiring A Lawyer
    • Lawyers Fees

    • Client Services

    • Client Assistance Office
    • Client Security Fund
    • Fee Dispute Resolution
    • Public Records Request
    • Locating Attorney Files

    • Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    • Public Member Application
  • For Members

    OSB Login

    • Log In To OSB Site
    • Member Account Setup
    • Non-Member Account Setup
    • Reset Password

    OSB Resources

    • Attorney's Marketplace
    • Career Center
    • Events
    • Forms Library
    • Online Resources
    • OSB Group Listings
    • Performance Standards
    • Rules Regulations and Policies
    • Surveys and Research Reports
    • Unclaimed Client Funds
    • Voting Regions and By-City
      County Information

    Fastcase™

    • Log in to Fastcase
    • Overview
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Inactive Member Subscriptions

    Legal Ethics

    • Legal Ethics Home
    • Find an Ethics Opinion
    • Bulletin Bar Counsel Archive

    Company Administrator

    • Company Administrator Home
    • Company Administrator FAQ
    • Authorization Form

    State Lawyers
    Assistance Committee

    • SLAC Info

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Court Information

    • Judicial Vacancies
    • Court Info | Calendars | Jury Info
    • Oregon Attorneys
      in Federal Court
    • Tribal Courts of Oregon

    OSB Publications

    • Bar Bulletin Magazine
    • – Bulletin Archive
    • – Legal Writer Archive
    • Capitol Insider
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter

    PLF Programs

    • (OAAP) Oregon Attorney
      Assistance Program
    • Practice Management Attorneys
    • Malpractice Coverage
  • CLE/Legal Publications

    CLE Seminars

    • CLE Seminars Home
    • Online Seminar Registration
    • General Info/FAQ

    My Account

    • My Content
    • My Events
    • Order History

    Legal Publications

    • Legal Publications Home
    • Log in to BarBooks®
    • BarBooks® FAQ
    • Online Bookstore
    • Legal Pubs Blog
  • Bar Programs

    Diversity & Inclusion

    • Diversity & Inclusion Home
    • Diversity Story Wall
    • D&I Programs
    • ACDI Roster
    • D&I Staff Contacts
    • D&I Links

    Legislative/Public Affairs

    • Legislative Home
    • Committee Contacts
    • Legislative Sessions
    • Staff Contacts
    • Useful Links

    Legal Services Program

    • LSP Home

    Oregon Law Foundation

    • OLF Home
    • Partners in Justice

    Fee Dispute Resolution

    • Fee Dispute Resolution Home

    Pro Bono

    • Pro Bono Home
    • Pro Bono Reporting
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Lawyer Referral and Information Services

    • RIS Login
    • Summary of Referral and Information Services Programs
    • Lawyer Referral Service Info and Registration Forms
    • Modest Means Program Registration Forms
    • Military Assistance Panel Training Info and Registration Form
    • Problem Solvers Registration Form
    • Lawyer To Lawyer Registration Form

    (LRAP) Loan Repayment Assistance Program

    • LRAP Home
    • LRAP FAQ
    • LRAP Policies
  • Member Groups

    Sections

    • Section Info/Websites
    • Joining Sections
    • CLE Registration Services
    • Standard Section Bylaws (PDF)
    • Leadership Resources
    • Treasurers Tools

    Committees

    • Home
    • Leadership Resources
    • Professionalism Commission
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    House of Delegates

    • HOD Home
    • HOD Resources
    • Meetings
    • Rules (PDF)
    • Roster (PDF)
    • Staff Contacts

    Board of Governors

    • BOG Home
    • Meetings & Agendas
    • Members
    • Liaisons
    • Committees
    • Resources
    • Task Forces

    Oregon New Lawyers Division

    • ONLD Home
    • Law Students
    • Student Loan Repayment
    • Committees
    • Upcoming Events

    Task Forces and Special Committees

    • Task Forces Home

    Volunteer Bars

    • List/Contacts
    • Leadership Resources

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities
  • Licensing/Compliance

    Admissions

    • Admissions Home
    • Alternative Admittance
    • Applicants for Admission
    • Admissions Forms
    • Past Bar Exam Results

    Supervised Practice Portfolio Examination

    • SPPE Home

    Licensed Paralegal Program

    • LP Home

    Lawyer Discipline

    • Discipline Home
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter
    • Disciplinary Boards
    • Client Assistance Office
    • (SPRB) State Professional Responsibility Board

    Membership Records

    • Address Changes
    • Good Standing Certificate
    • Request Discipline File Review

    MCLE

    • MCLE Home
    • Program Database
    • Forms
    • Rules (PDF)

    IOLTA Reporting

    • IOLTA Home
    • IOLTA FAQ

    Licensing Fees

    • Licensing Fee FAQ
    • Licensing Fee Payment

    Status Changes

    • Status Changes FAQ
    • Inactive Status Form
    • Retired Status Form
    • Active Pro Bono Status Form
    • Reinstatement Forms
    • Resignation Form A
    • Pending Reinstatements

    Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    Pro Hac Vice/Arbitration

    • Pro Hac Vice
    • Arbitration

    New Lawyer Mentoring Program

    • New Lawyer Mentoring Program Home

    Professional Liability Fund

    • Professional Liability
      Fund Website
For The Public

Public Information Home
Legal Information Topics
Oregon Juror Guide
Finding The Right Lawyer
Hiring A Lawyer
Lawyers Fees
Client Assistance Office
Public Records Request
Unlawful Practice of Law
Fee Dispute Resolution
Client Security Fund
Volunteer Opportunities
for the Public

For Members

BarBooks®
Bulletin Archive
Career Center
Fastcase™
Judicial Vacancies
Legal Ethics Opinions
OSB Group Listings
OSB Login
OSB Rules & Regs
SLAC Info
Surveys and Reports
Volunteer Opportunities

CLE/Legal Pubs

CLE Seminars Home
Legal Publications Home

Bar Programs

Diversity & Inclusion
Fee Arbitration/Mediation
Legal Services Program
Legislative/Public Affairs
Loan Repayment
Assistance Program

Oregon Law Foundation
Pro Bono

Member Groups

Board of Governors
Committees
House of Delegates
Volunteer Bars
Oregon New
Lawyers Division

OSB Sections
Professionalism
Commission

Volunteer Opportunities

About The Bar

About the Bar
ADA Notice
Contact Info
Copyright Notice
Directions to the Bar
Meeting Room Rentals
Mission Statement
OSB Job Opportunities
Privacy Policy
Staff Directory
Terms of Use

Licensing/Compliance

Admissions
Client Assistance Office
Client Security Fund
IOLTA Reporting
Lawyer Discipline
MCLE
Member Fee FAQ
New Lawyer
Mentoring Program

Professional Liability Fund
Status Changes

Oregon State Bar Center

Phone: (503) 620-0222
Toll-free in Oregon: (800) 452-8260
Facsimile: (503) 684-1366

Building Location:
16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Mailing Address:
PO Box 231935
Tigard, OR 97281

Oregon State Bar location Map

Copyright ©1997 Oregon State Bar  ®All rights reserved | ADA Notice | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use