Skip to Content
  • Home
  • About the Bar
  • Mission
  • Forms
  • Sitemap
    • Member Directory
      Last Name:
      First Name:
      Bar Number:
      City:


    • Login
OSB Logo

Oregon State Bar Bulletin — JULY 2002

Bar Counsel
ETHICS, POST 9/11:
Federal anti-terrorism regulations raise ethics issues for lawyers
By Sylvia E. Stevens

In the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States, a variety of security measures were enacted and implemented in an effort to prevent a recurrence of that horrific day. Some of the security measures are relatively mundane (long lines and random inspections at airports and public buildings) and have been so readily incorporated into 'post-9/11' life that it is hard to remember what it was like before. Other measures are considerably more significant and have the possibility of fundamentally altering the rights that we have always taken for granted. One security step that has been discussed and debated to considerable extent, at least in the legal community, is the government's plan to monitor certain conversations between inmates and their attorneys.

Within a few days of the attacks, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft promulgated regulations that purport to provide 'authority for the monitoring of communications between an inmate and his or her attorneys or their agents, where there has been a specific determination that such actions are reasonably necessary in order to deter future acts of violence or terrorism, and upon a specific notification to the inmate and the attorneys involved.' 66 Fed. Reg. No. 211 at 55064 (Oct. 31, 2001).1 These regulations apply to inmates in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons, and to persons 'held in the custody of other officials under the authority of the Attorney General.' Id. While recognizing 'the existence of the attorney-client privilege and an inmate's right to counsel,' the attorney general asserts that 'not all communications between an inmate and an attorney would fall within the scope of that privilege.' Id.

The Oregon Code of Professional Responsibility requires Oregon lawyers to provide zealous and competent representation to every client. See DR 7-101(A)(1); DR 6-101 (A). Both state law and the disciplinary rules require a lawyer to preserve a client's confidences and secrets. ORS 9.460(3) ['maintain the confidences and secrets of the lawyer's clients consistent with the rules of professional conduct']; DR 4-101(B)(1) ['a lawyer shall not knowingly... reveal a confidence or secret of the lawyer's client.'] In light of the AG's regulations, and despite the fact that they seem to apply to only a limited population of inmates,2 lawyers have questioned whether they can zealously and competently represent an inmate client under circumstances where it may be impossible to preserve the client's confidences and secrets, or whether a lawyer must withdraw as counsel to the client under such circumstances.

The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees a right to the effective assistance of counsel in felony cases and in misdemeanor cases where imprisonment may be imposed as a penalty. Exactly what constitutes 'effective assistance of counsel,' both as it relates to confidential communications and otherwise, is a question of constitutional law ultimately to be decided by the federal courts. It is also subject to change to the same extent that other constitutional interpretation is shaped by societal changes.

Oregon lawyers are required to support the Constitution, ORS 9.460(1) and to provide legal counsel to persons in need; ORS 9.460(4) provides that an lawyer 'shall . . . [n]ever reject, for any personal consideration, the cause of the defenseless or the oppressed.' Simply because circumstances make it difficult to fulfill these obligations does not give grounds for withdrawal as counsel. Especially in difficult circumstances, the client still needs effective counsel, and the lawyer remains obligated to provide zealous and competent representation. The means of fulfilling these ethical obligations may change in such circumstances, but the obligations nevertheless remain.

The duty to maintain the confidences and secrets of clients appears virtually absolute. Subject to express but limited exceptions, the DRs provide that 'a lawyer shall not knowingly… [r]eveal a confidence or secret of the lawyer's client.'3 Under the exceptions, a lawyer may reveal '[c]onfidences or secrets when…required by law or court order,' DR 4-101(C)(2), and may also reveal '[t]he intention of the lawyer's client to commit a crime and the information necessary to prevent the crime.' DR 4-101(C)(3). Lawyers also have a 'duty to exercise reasonable care to prevent their employees from disclosing client secrets.' State v. Chatsworth, 151 Or.App. 100, 164, 951 P.2d 153 (1997). Lawyers are subject to discipline if they fail to fulfill these obligations. Id.

By definition, it is not possible to preserve a client's confidences and secrets in circumstances where a third person is monitoring all communications between lawyer and client. The 'firewall' procedures of the attorney general's regulations do not change this fact. Hence a lawyer representing a client covered by the regulations must advise and warn the client, before any communication takes place, that their communications are not confidential and will not be protected by the attorney-client privilege. The lawyer must reasonably satisfy herself that the client understands this advice and warning before any further conversation takes place. Giving such advice - and receiving such reasonable satisfaction - is an essential ethical obligation of the lawyer under these circumstances.

Whether a lawyer can provide effective assistance without holding a confidential conversation with the inmate client will vary from case to case. In some cases, it may be possible for the lawyer to provide effective assistance without holding a confidential conversation. In other cases, it may be essential to hold such a confidential conversation in order for the lawyer to provide zealous and competent representation. Under such circumstances, the lawyer will have an ethical obligation to seek a court order that would permit an unmonitored conversation to take place.4 In all cases, the lawyer has an ethical obligation to form a reasonable professional judgment as to whether to seek such a court order, and to continue to provide zealous and competent representation to the client even if the order is denied.

The lawyer must also be mindful of her own obligations under the DRs with regard to criminal conduct. It is 'professional misconduct' for a lawyer to '[c]ommit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness or fitness to practice law' DR 1-102(A)(2), or to '[e]ngage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.' DR 1-102(A)(3). It is also 'professional misconduct' for a lawyer to '[v]iolate these disciplinary rules, knowingly assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another.' DR 1-102(A)(1). A lawyer is responsible for another lawyer's violation of the professional rules if '[t]he lawyer orders or, with knowledge of the specific conduct, ratifies the conduct involved; or [t]he lawyer has direct supervisory authority over the other lawyer and knows of the conduct at a time when its consequences can be avoided or mitigated but fails to take reasonable remedial action.' DR 1-102(B)(1) and (2). Additionally, a lawyer will be 'bound by the rules of professional conduct notwithstanding that the lawyer acted at the direction of another person.' DR 1-102(C).

In the representation of a client, a lawyer shall not: '[c]onceal or knowingly fail to disclose that which the lawyer is required by law to reveal[,]'DR 7-102(A)(3); '[c]ounsel or assist the lawyer's client in conduct that the lawyer knows to be illegal or fraudulent[,]' DR 7-102(A)(7); or '[k]nowingly engage in other illegal conduct or conduct contrary to a Disciplinary Rule.' DR 7-102(A)(8). In the lawyer's representation of a client, a lawyer may '[r]efuse to aid or participate in conduct that the lawyer believes to be unlawful even though there is some support for an argument that the conduct is legal.' DR 7-101(B)(2).

Our post-September 11 world is different in ways large and small. The work of lawyers may be complicated by the legitimate interest (and obligation) of the government to institute means to ensure safety and security. Whether the attorney general's regulations remain in force is an issue yet to be decided. Ethical obligations to clients, however, remain constant.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Sylvia E. Stevens is assistant general counsel of the Oregon State Bar. She gratefully acknowledges the OSB Legal Ethics Committee for its analysis of this issue. Two other articles of interest are a panel discussion on civil liberties in the March 2002 issue of the Washington DC bar magazine, The Washington Lawyer, and Jeffrey Toobin's profile of Attorney General Ashcroft in the April 15, 2002 issue of New Yorker.

© 2002 Sylvia E. Stevens

ENDNOTES
1. The attorney general made these 'interim' rules effective Oct. 30, 2001, without following the usual procedures for advance notice and comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. §553, which he suspended under the 'foreign affairs' and 'good cause' exceptions.

2. At the time this article was written there were only 13-15 inmates in the federal prison system to whom these regulations would apply; no inmates in the BOP facility in Sheridan would be subject to monitoring.

3. The disciplinary rules define 'confidence' as 'information protected by the attorney-client privilege under applicable law,' and 'secret' as 'other information gained in a current or former professional relationship that the client has requested be held inviolate or the disclosure of which would be embarrassing or would be likely to be detrimental to the client.'

4. Whether or not the regulation impermissibly erodes the attorney-client privilege or denies effective assistance of counsel are legal and constitutional questions that will be resolved by the courts.


— return to top
— return to Table of Contents

  • For The Public

      Public Legal Information

    • Public Information Home
    • Legal Information Topics
    • Juror Handbook

    • Getting Legal Help

    • Finding The Right Lawyer
    • Hiring A Lawyer
    • Lawyers Fees

    • Client Services

    • Client Assistance Office
    • Client Security Fund
    • Fee Dispute Resolution
    • Public Records Request
    • Locating Attorney Files

    • Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    • Public Member Application
  • For Members

    OSB Login

    • Log In To OSB Site
    • Member Account Setup
    • Non-Member Account Setup
    • Reset Password

    OSB Resources

    • Attorney's Marketplace
    • Career Center
    • Events
    • Forms Library
    • Online Resources
    • OSB Group Listings
    • Performance Standards
    • Rules Regulations and Policies
    • Surveys and Research Reports
    • Unclaimed Client Funds
    • Voting Regions and By-City
      County Information

    Fastcase™

    • Log in to Fastcase
    • Overview
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Inactive Member Subscriptions

    Legal Ethics

    • Legal Ethics Home
    • Find an Ethics Opinion
    • Bulletin Bar Counsel Archive

    Company Administrator

    • Company Administrator Home
    • Company Administrator FAQ
    • Authorization Form

    State Lawyers
    Assistance Committee

    • SLAC Info

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Court Information

    • Judicial Vacancies
    • Court Info | Calendars | Jury Info
    • Oregon Attorneys
      in Federal Court
    • Tribal Courts of Oregon

    OSB Publications

    • Bar Bulletin Magazine
    • – Bulletin Archive
    • – Legal Writer Archive
    • Capitol Insider
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter

    PLF Programs

    • (OAAP) Oregon Attorney
      Assistance Program
    • Practice Management Attorneys
    • Malpractice Coverage
  • CLE/Legal Publications

    CLE Seminars

    • CLE Seminars Home
    • Online Seminar Registration
    • General Info/FAQ

    My Account

    • My Content
    • My Events
    • Order History

    Legal Publications

    • Legal Publications Home
    • Log in to BarBooks
    • BarBooks FAQ
    • Online Bookstore
    • Legal Pubs Blog
  • Bar Programs

    Diversity & Inclusion

    • Diversity & Inclusion Home
    • Diversity Story Wall
    • D&I Programs
    • ACDI Roster
    • D&I Staff Contacts
    • D&I Links

    Legislative/Public Affairs

    • Legislative Home
    • Committee Contacts
    • Legislative Sessions
    • Staff Contacts
    • Useful Links

    Legal Services Program

    • LSP Home

    Oregon Law Foundation

    • OLF Home
    • Partners in Justice

    Fee Dispute Resolution

    • Fee Dispute Resolution Home

    Pro Bono

    • Pro Bono Home
    • Pro Bono Reporting
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Lawyer Referral and Information Services

    • RIS Login
    • Summary of Referral and Information Services Programs
    • Lawyer Referral Service Info and Registration Forms
    • Modest Means Program Registration Forms
    • Military Assistance Panel Training Info and Registration Form
    • Problem Solvers Registration Form
    • Lawyer To Lawyer Registration Form

    (LRAP) Loan Repayment Assistance Program

    • LRAP Home
    • LRAP FAQ
    • LRAP Policies
  • Member Groups

    Sections

    • Section Info/Websites
    • Joining Sections
    • CLE Registration Services
    • Standard Section Bylaws (PDF)
    • Leadership Resources
    • Treasurers Tools

    Committees

    • Home
    • Leadership Resources
    • Professionalism Commission
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    House of Delegates

    • HOD Home
    • HOD Resources
    • Meetings
    • Rules (PDF)
    • Roster (PDF)
    • Staff Contacts

    Board of Governors

    • BOG Home
    • Meetings & Agendas
    • Members
    • Liaisons
    • Committees
    • Resources
    • Task Forces

    Oregon New Lawyers Division

    • ONLD Home
    • Law Students
    • Student Loan Repayment
    • Committees
    • Upcoming Events

    Task Forces and Special Committees

    • Task Forces Home

    Volunteer Bars

    • List/Contacts
    • Leadership Resources

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities
  • Licensing/Compliance

    Admissions

    • Admissions Home
    • Alternative Admittance
    • Applicants for Admission
    • Admissions Forms
    • Past Bar Exam Results

    Licensed Paralegal Program

    • LP Home

    Pro Hac Vice/Arbitration

    • Pro Hac Vice
    • Arbitration

    Lawyer Discipline

    • Discipline Home
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter
    • Disciplinary Boards
    • Client Assistance Office
    • (SPRB) State Professional Responsibility Board

    Membership Records

    • Address Changes
    • Good Standing Certificate
    • Request Discipline File Review

    MCLE

    • MCLE Home
    • Program Database
    • Forms
    • Rules (PDF)

    IOLTA Reporting

    • IOLTA Home
    • IOLTA FAQ

    Membership Fees

    • Member Fee FAQ
    • Member Fee Payment

    Status Changes

    • Status Changes FAQ
    • Inactive Status Form
    • Retired Status Form
    • Active Pro Bono Status Form
    • Reinstatement Forms
    • Resignation Form A
    • Pending Reinstatements

    Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    New Lawyer Mentoring Program

    • New Lawyer Mentoring Program Home

    Professional Liability Fund

    • Professional Liability Fund Website
For The Public

Public Information Home
Legal Information Topics
Juror Handbook
Finding The Right Lawyer
Hiring A Lawyer
Lawyers Fees
Client Assistance Office
Public Records Request
Unlawful Practice of Law
Fee Dispute Resolution
Client Security Fund
Volunteer Opportunities
for the Public

For Members

BarBooks™
Bulletin Archive
Career Center
Fastcase™
Judicial Vacancies
Legal Ethics Opinions
OSB Group Listings
OSB Login
OSB Rules & Regs
SLAC Info
Surveys and Reports
Volunteer Opportunities

CLE/Legal Pubs

CLE Seminars Home
Legal Publications Home

Bar Programs

Diversity & Inclusion
Fee Arbitration/Mediation
Legal Services Program
Legislative/Public Affairs
Loan Repayment
Assistance Program

Oregon Law Foundation
Pro Bono

Member Groups

Board of Governors
Committees
House of Delegates
Volunteer Bars
Oregon New
Lawyers Division

OSB Sections
Professionalism
Commission

Volunteer Opportunities

About The Bar

About the Bar
ADA Notice
Contact Info
Copyright Notice
Directions to the Bar
Meeting Room Rentals
Mission Statement
OSB Job Opportunities
Privacy Policy
Staff Directory
Terms of Use

Licensing/Compliance

Admissions
Client Assistance Office
Client Security Fund
IOLTA Reporting
Lawyer Discipline
MCLE
Member Fee FAQ
New Lawyer
Mentoring Program

Professional Liability Fund
Status Changes

Oregon State Bar Center

Phone: (503) 620-0222
Toll-free in Oregon: (800) 452-8260
Facsimile: (503) 684-1366

Building Location:
16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Mailing Address:
PO Box 231935
Tigard, OR 97281

Oregon State Bar location Map

Copyright ©1997 Oregon State Bar  ®All rights reserved | ADA Notice | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use