Skip to Content
  • Home
  • About the Bar
  • Mission
  • Forms
  • Sitemap
    • Member Directory
      Last Name:
      First Name:
      Bar Number:
      City:


    • Login
OSB Logo

Parting Thoughts

Wrong on ABA

By Dianne K. Dailey

For half a century, the American Bar Association Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary has evaluated the professional qualifications of potential nominees to the federal bench. It has provided this valuable public service to every administration, Democrat and Republican alike, since President Dwight Eisenhower asked the association to assist him in order to resist growing pressures to repay political debts by appointing unqualified people to the federal bench. President Eisenhower's request was, and is, important to American citizens because under the Constitution, federal judges have lifetime tenure. While it is important for all judges to be selected based solely on their qualifications for the job, it is particularly important when a jurist will hold the position for life.

For the last 50 years, the committee, composed of 15 distinguished lawyers who serve as volunteers for a three-year term, has conducted extensive background checks of proposed candidates for judicial appointment before the individuals were nominated, interviewing judges, lawyers and clients. Former and current committee members estimate that they spent up to 1,000 hours a year performing their investigations. Performing this service before the names of proposed candidates were made public was important since it allowed for in-depth investigations and for those interviewed to speak candidly. It also allowed the committee to alert the administration to any information that it uncovered it that might affect the administration's decision to nominate the individual.

The ABA committee considers only three criteria in making its evaluation: professional competence, integrity and judicial temperament. It does not consider ideology or political philosophy in any evaluation and reports to the administration on whether the prospective candidate is 'highly qualified,' 'qualified' or 'not qualified' in terms of those three criteria..

Unfortunately, the Bush administration has chosen to significantly modify this important process and has advised the ABA that the standing committee will not be given names of proposed candidates before the names are made public. Instead, the committee will learn of the proposed candidates when they are publicly announced. Opponents of the ABA's previous involvement in the evaluation of potential nominees to the federal bench argue that the committee has favored candidates nominated by Democratic administrations. In fact, between 1960 and the present, presidents have nominated some 2,000 individuals to be federal judges. Only 26 were found 'not qualified' by the Committee and of those, 23 were nominated by Democratic presidents and only three by Republicans. This is hardly a record that suggests the ABA is biased in favor of Democrats.

Critics also have charged that the ABA discriminates against 'conservative' candidates and point to Judge Robert Bork as an example, suggesting that the committee found him to be 'not qualified' because of his political views. In reality, the standing committee advised the Senate Judiciary Committee that 10 of the 15 members of the standing committee rated him 'highly qualified,' that one member abstained from voting and that four rated Bork 'not qualified' with regard to judicial temperament. Further support for the position that the committee does not discriminate against conservatives can be found in the rating of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonio Scalia, unabashedly one of the most conservative justices on the federal bench. The committee unanimously found Justice Scalia 'highly qualified' with regard to all three criteria.

With regard to the charge that the ABA president or board of governors somehow influence the committee's evaluations, the committee's work has been so confidential that even the president of the association has not known who was being evaluated or what the evaluations were until that information was made public by the Senate Judiciary Committee during the confirmation process.

As the national representative of all segments of the legal profession, the ABA is in the best position to provide a fair, confidential peer-review evaluation of the professional qualifications of federal judicial candidates. The association is committed to continuing this time-tested process that has helped ensure the federal judiciary of this nation is the envy of the world. The committee will continue this work during the present administration, the only difference being that the nominees' names will be public before the interview process begins. However, the association and the committee rightfully are concerned that the committee members will not have time to conduct the quality of background checks they previously conducted and that those interviewed will be less candid, knowing that the candidate's name has been made public.

The real issue is not the supposed political leanings of more than 400,000 members of the American Bar Association. The real issue is whether America will continue to have a federal judiciary of the highest possible caliber. +


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Dianne Dailey is the chair of the ABA Section Officers Conference, which consists of the officers of the 37 sections, divisions and forums of the ABA. She is a shareholder in the Portland office of Bullivant Houser Bailey. The opinions expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the position of Bullivant Houser Bailey or its clients.


return to top
return to Table of Contents

 

 



  • For The Public

      Public Legal Information

    • Public Information Home
    • Legal Information Topics
    • Oregon Juror Guide
    • Submit Ethics Complaint

    • Getting Legal Help

    • Finding The Right Lawyer
    • Hiring A Lawyer
    • Lawyers Fees

    • Client Services

    • Client Assistance Office
    • Client Security Fund
    • Fee Dispute Resolution
    • Public Records Request
    • Locating Attorney Files

    • Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    • Public Member Application
  • For Members

    OSB Login

    • Log In To OSB Site
    • Member Account Setup
    • Non-Member Account Setup
    • Reset Password

    OSB Resources

    • Attorney's Marketplace
    • Career Center
    • Events
    • Forms Library
    • Online Resources
    • OSB Group Listings
    • Performance Standards
    • Rules Regulations and Policies
    • Surveys and Research Reports
    • Unclaimed Client Funds
    • Voting Regions and By-City
      County Information

    Fastcase™

    • Log in to Fastcase
    • Overview
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Inactive Member Subscriptions

    Legal Ethics

    • Legal Ethics Home
    • Find an Ethics Opinion
    • Bulletin Bar Counsel Archive

    Company Administrator

    • Company Administrator Home
    • Company Administrator FAQ
    • Authorization Form

    State Lawyers
    Assistance Committee

    • SLAC Info

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Court Information

    • Judicial Vacancies
    • Court Info | Calendars | Jury Info
    • Oregon Attorneys
      in Federal Court
    • Tribal Courts of Oregon

    OSB Publications

    • Bar Bulletin Magazine
    • – Bulletin Archive
    • – Legal Writer Archive
    • Capitol Insider
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter

    PLF Programs

    • (OAAP) Oregon Attorney
      Assistance Program
    • Practice Management Attorneys
    • Malpractice Coverage
  • CLE/Legal Publications

    CLE Seminars

    • CLE Seminars Home
    • Online Seminar Registration
    • General Info/FAQ

    My Account

    • My Content
    • My Events
    • Order History

    Legal Publications

    • Legal Publications Home
    • Log in to BarBooks®
    • BarBooks® FAQ
    • Online Bookstore
    • Legal Pubs Blog
  • Bar Programs

    Diversity & Inclusion

    • Diversity & Inclusion Home
    • Diversity Story Wall
    • D&I Programs
    • ACDI Roster
    • D&I Staff Contacts
    • D&I Links

    Legislative/Public Affairs

    • Legislative Home
    • Committee Contacts
    • Legislative Sessions
    • Staff Contacts
    • Useful Links

    Legal Services Program

    • LSP Home

    Oregon Law Foundation

    • OLF Home
    • Partners in Justice

    Fee Dispute Resolution

    • Fee Dispute Resolution Home

    Pro Bono

    • Pro Bono Home
    • Pro Bono Reporting
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Lawyer Referral and Information Services

    • RIS Login
    • Summary of Referral and Information Services Programs
    • Lawyer Referral Service Info and Registration Forms
    • Modest Means Program Registration Forms
    • Military Assistance Panel Training Info and Registration Form
    • Problem Solvers Registration Form
    • Lawyer To Lawyer Registration Form

    (LRAP) Loan Repayment Assistance Program

    • LRAP Home
    • LRAP FAQ
    • LRAP Policies
  • Member Groups

    Sections

    • Section Info/Websites
    • Joining Sections
    • CLE Registration Services
    • Standard Section Bylaws (PDF)
    • Leadership Resources
    • Treasurers Tools

    Committees

    • Home
    • Leadership Resources
    • Professionalism Commission
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    House of Delegates

    • HOD Home
    • HOD Resources
    • Meetings
    • Rules (PDF)
    • Roster (PDF)
    • Staff Contacts

    Board of Governors

    • BOG Home
    • Meetings & Agendas
    • Members
    • Liaisons
    • Committees
    • Resources
    • Task Forces

    Oregon New Lawyers Division

    • ONLD Home
    • Law Students
    • Student Loan Repayment
    • Committees
    • Upcoming Events

    Task Forces and Special Committees

    • Task Forces Home

    Volunteer Bars

    • List/Contacts
    • Leadership Resources

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities
  • Licensing/Compliance

    Admissions

    • Admissions Home
    • Alternative Admittance
    • Applicants for Admission
    • Admissions Forms
    • Past Bar Exam Results

    Supervised Practice Portfolio Examination

    • SPPE Home

    Licensed Paralegal Program

    • LP Home

    Lawyer Discipline

    • Discipline Home
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter
    • Disciplinary Boards
    • Client Assistance Office
    • (SPRB) State Professional Responsibility Board

    Membership Records

    • Address Changes
    • Good Standing Certificate
    • Request Discipline File Review

    MCLE

    • MCLE Home
    • Program Database
    • Forms
    • Rules (PDF)

    IOLTA Reporting

    • IOLTA Home
    • IOLTA FAQ

    Licensing Fees

    • Licensing Fee FAQ
    • Licensing Fee Payment

    Status Changes

    • Status Changes FAQ
    • Inactive Status Form
    • Retired Status Form
    • Active Pro Bono Status Form
    • Reinstatement Forms
    • Resignation Form A
    • Pending Reinstatements

    Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    Pro Hac Vice/Arbitration

    • Pro Hac Vice
    • Arbitration

    New Lawyer Mentoring Program

    • New Lawyer Mentoring Program Home

    Professional Liability Fund

    • Professional Liability
      Fund Website
For The Public

Public Information Home
Legal Information Topics
Oregon Juror Guide
Finding The Right Lawyer
Hiring A Lawyer
Lawyers Fees
Client Assistance Office
Public Records Request
Unlawful Practice of Law
Fee Dispute Resolution
Client Security Fund
Volunteer Opportunities
for the Public

For Members

BarBooks®
Bulletin Archive
Career Center
Fastcase™
Judicial Vacancies
Legal Ethics Opinions
OSB Group Listings
OSB Login
OSB Rules & Regs
SLAC Info
Surveys and Reports
Volunteer Opportunities

CLE/Legal Pubs

CLE Seminars Home
Legal Publications Home

Bar Programs

Diversity & Inclusion
Fee Arbitration/Mediation
Legal Services Program
Legislative/Public Affairs
Loan Repayment
Assistance Program

Oregon Law Foundation
Pro Bono

Member Groups

Board of Governors
Committees
House of Delegates
Volunteer Bars
Oregon New
Lawyers Division

OSB Sections
Professionalism
Commission

Volunteer Opportunities

About The Bar

About the Bar
ADA Notice
Contact Info
Copyright Notice
Directions to the Bar
Meeting Room Rentals
Mission Statement
OSB Job Opportunities
Privacy Policy
Staff Directory
Terms of Use

Licensing/Compliance

Admissions
Client Assistance Office
Client Security Fund
IOLTA Reporting
Lawyer Discipline
MCLE
Member Fee FAQ
New Lawyer
Mentoring Program

Professional Liability Fund
Status Changes

Oregon State Bar Center

Phone: (503) 620-0222
Toll-free in Oregon: (800) 452-8260
Facsimile: (503) 684-1366

Building Location:
16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Mailing Address:
PO Box 231935
Tigard, OR 97281

Oregon State Bar location Map

Copyright ©1997 Oregon State Bar  ®All rights reserved | ADA Notice | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use