Skip to Content
  • Home
  • About the Bar
  • Mission
  • Forms
  • Sitemap
    • Member Directory
      Last Name:
      First Name:
      Bar Number:
      City:


    • Login
OSB Logo

Feature

Problem Solvers

Thoughts on diversity education

By Jaime M.W. Sanders


A PARABLE
There was once a large family of cousins, the descendants of four sisters, who gathered once a year at Thanksgiving. For many years some of the cousins had been excluded from the family gathering. They were the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of Aunt Ingrid, who had lost her share of the family inheritance and moved away from the parents' farm. At least that is how the descendants of Aunt Cecily described it. Aunt Ingrid's descendants remembered (more accurately, I fear) that Aunt Cecily had stolen her sister's birthright and poisoned her parents' minds against Aunt Ingrid. This is not something you boast about to your children, so Aunt Cecily always referred to her sister as 'your poor Aunt Ingrid,' and Aunt Cecily's children were taught to look down on their less well-off cousins. Aunt Cecily's children, enjoying the fruits of two portions, ascribed their wealth to their own industry, and saw in their cousin's poverty proof of the poor choices natural to the offspring of 'poor Aunt Ingrid.'

Many years had passed, and some of the cousins decided it was time to let bygones be bygones and invite all the cousins to Thanksgiving, which was held on the ancestral farm owned by Aunt Cecily's descendants. Things were a little awkward, of course. Some of the ruder boys taunted Aunt Ingrid's descendants - but they made sure to do it out of hearing of the parents, and the cousins who were the victims felt shamed and didn't like to complain. When Aunt Ingrid's descendants tried to talk about their great-grandmother, whom they had loved and were proud of, the hosts quickly changed the subject - they had been taught that Aunt Ingrid was shameful - a taboo subject. When Aunt Cecily's descendants talked about their great-grandmother, Aunt Ingrid's descendants bit their tongues because it would have been rude to point out that Aunt Cecily was a liar and a thief. So there was awkward general conversation, and the evening ended with Aunt Cecily's descendants feeling generous about letting 'poor Aunt Ingrid's' family attend, (and a little hurt that they weren't more grateful), and Aunt Ingrid's descendants feeling angry at the condescension of their hosts and the insults to their children.

THE PARABLE APPLIED
This parable is suggested as a metaphor for where the Oregon State Bar is with respect to race. Readers who missed them should read the recent letters to the editor on this issue in the December 2000 and February/March 2001 issues of the OSB Bulletin. One writer questioned the need for an MCLE credit requirement for 'a serious [sic] of 'do good, feel good' training classes' on diversity. 'Most of us, even old goobers like me, have figured out that gender, race and the rest of the litany don't make any difference in the work place….' Another writer rejoined that 'I can tell you without hesitation and without qualification that minority lawyers are the subject of racial discrimination in Oregon.' In the context of the parable, one person is saying 'What is the issue - everyone is invited to the party now.' Another is saying 'We are at the party, but often ignored and condescended to, and sometimes insulted.'

The parable is inaccurate, however, in that the 'party' we are dealing with is not an optional family Thanksgiving celebration, but the exclusive means of justice in our society. In May 1994, the Oregon Judicial Department published the 'Report of the Oregon Supreme Court Task Force on Racial/Ethnic Issues in the Judicial System.' The finding of the study was: 'While overt, intended discrimination against minorities by nonminority judges, prosecutors, lawyers and court staff is not common, strong evidence demonstrates that racial minorities are at a disadvantage in virtually all aspects of the Oregon court system.' (Task Force Report, p. 2). It did not find that the disadvantages facing racial minorities were the result of conscious bias. The report agreed with both writers to the Bulletin that by and large lawyers have learned to not consciously discriminate on the basis of race:

If a poll were taken of all the lawyers, court staff and judges in Oregon, it is doubtful that even one person would admit that he or she discriminates against minorities in any way. 'Sure,' they might say, 'there's a problem. But someone else is causing it. Not me.' [Task Force Report, p. vi]

But the report also found wide ignorance by non-minorities of the basic realities of minority experience and culture. And it found unrecognized racial stereotypes affecting decisions. And it found that because the vast majority of lawyers and court personnel are non-minorities, this ignorance and stereotyping created results that 'should dismay all persons dedicated to the concept of equal justice for all.' (Task Force Report, p.3). The report concluded that the task of creating equal justice required that non-minorities assume responsibility for being part of the solution:

Non-minorities have brought about many of the problems that minorities encounter and are discussed in this report. Addressing these problems, and ultimately solving them, is the joint responsibility of non-minorities and minorities. [Task Force Report, p. v]

This requires non-minorities to recognize what minorities already know - that minority lawyers are the subject of racial discrimination in Oregon, and that although the party is open to all, not everyone is treated as an honored guest.

Recognition is painful for non-minorities. It requires examining the habits and attitudes learned as children, and maybe recognizing that our Grandmother Cecily lied to us. What is the objective? Is it just to encourage chronic complainers or to force us into 'political correctness?' No, it is to turn us from being co-creators of the problem to being problem-solvers. That requires not the lip service of 'political correctness,' but an active search for truth and vision. That challenges us to recognize both that gender, race and the rest of the litany don't make any difference in ability and that they nevertheless make a difference in the present workplace. It challenges us to examine whether we really are as color-blind in our hiring and promotion decisions as we think we are, or whether our racial blinders are affecting our perception of the job or of the individuals doing or seeking the job. It challenges us to create a workplace and a judicial system of true equality. 'The goal is to achieve a heterogeneous culture, one in which racial prejudice and bias, overt or covert, intended or unintended, no longer exists. How can this be achieved? By education, education and more education.' (Task Force Report, p. 21)

In promulgating the new MCLE requirement, the Oregon Supreme Court took one big step toward encouraging dialogue and education. (The new MCLE requirement was described in an article by Sylvia Stevens in the May 2001 Bulletin). The rest is up to all of us, the members of this bar. We have a choice. We can sign up for the minimum course to get MCLE credit, sit with closed ears and closed mouth, and afterwards complain to friends about the 'politically correct BS.' Or we can listen, share and learn. We can each bring our life experience and knowledge actively to bear on the issue of race. The members of this bar are a group of smart problem-solvers. Imagine the difference we could make if we each take responsibility for making this party truly open and belonging to all. +

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

The Understanding Racism Foundation sponsors discussions of racial issues. Small groups meet with volunteer facilitators once a week for six weeks. The curriculum includes some assigned reading and reports on reading done outside of class. All viewpoints are welcome. The class is qualified for the new MCLE credit, but the foundation is not here to 'train' participants into political correctness. Volunteers help participants talk about a subject - race - that we have mostly been taught to be silent about; to encourage people to open their own eyes and ears. The foundation welcomes your participation in the dialogue.

The members of the board of directors of the Understanding Racism are Justice Edwin Peterson, Hon. Cynthia D. Carlson, Duane Bosworth, Ken Boddie, Roger Luedtke, Chris Lundberg, Lili Olberding, Joseph A. Pugh, Joseph M. Quinones and Jaime Sanders. For information about classes, contact Mary Dail, director, Understanding Racism Foundation, P.O. Box 1089, Portland, Ore. 97207-1089; phone: (503) 274-1747; or e-mail: understandracism@qwest.net.

-Jaime Sanders


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Jaime M.W. Sanders practices tax law as a member of Stoel Rives and learns about race and society as a member of the Understanding Racism Foundation.


return to top
return to Table of Contents

 

 



  • For The Public

      Public Legal Information

    • Public Information Home
    • Legal Information Topics
    • Oregon Juror Guide
    • Submit Ethics Complaint

    • Getting Legal Help

    • Finding The Right Lawyer
    • Hiring A Lawyer
    • Lawyers Fees

    • Client Services

    • Client Assistance Office
    • Client Security Fund
    • Fee Dispute Resolution
    • Public Records Request
    • Locating Attorney Files

    • Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    • Public Member Application
  • For Members

    OSB Login

    • Log In To OSB Site
    • Member Account Setup
    • Non-Member Account Setup
    • Reset Password

    OSB Resources

    • Attorney's Marketplace
    • Career Center
    • Events
    • Forms Library
    • Online Resources
    • OSB Group Listings
    • Performance Standards
    • Rules Regulations and Policies
    • Surveys and Research Reports
    • Unclaimed Client Funds
    • Voting Regions and By-City
      County Information

    Fastcase™

    • Log in to Fastcase
    • Overview
    • Scheduled Webinars
    • Inactive Member Subscriptions

    Legal Ethics

    • Legal Ethics Home
    • Find an Ethics Opinion
    • Bulletin Bar Counsel Archive

    Company Administrator

    • Company Administrator Home
    • Company Administrator FAQ
    • Authorization Form

    State Lawyers
    Assistance Committee

    • SLAC Info

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Court Information

    • Judicial Vacancies
    • Court Info | Calendars | Jury Info
    • Oregon Attorneys
      in Federal Court
    • Tribal Courts of Oregon

    OSB Publications

    • Bar Bulletin Magazine
    • – Bulletin Archive
    • – Legal Writer Archive
    • Capitol Insider
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter

    PLF Programs

    • (OAAP) Oregon Attorney
      Assistance Program
    • Practice Management Attorneys
    • Malpractice Coverage
  • CLE/Legal Publications

    CLE Seminars

    • CLE Seminars Home
    • Online Seminar Registration
    • General Info/FAQ

    My Account

    • My Content
    • My Events
    • Order History

    Legal Publications

    • Legal Publications Home
    • Log in to BarBooks®
    • BarBooks® FAQ
    • Online Bookstore
    • Legal Pubs Blog
  • Bar Programs

    Diversity & Inclusion

    • Diversity & Inclusion Home
    • Diversity Story Wall
    • D&I Programs
    • ACDI Roster
    • D&I Staff Contacts
    • D&I Links

    Legislative/Public Affairs

    • Legislative Home
    • Committee Contacts
    • Legislative Sessions
    • Staff Contacts
    • Useful Links

    Legal Services Program

    • LSP Home

    Oregon Law Foundation

    • OLF Home
    • Partners in Justice

    Fee Dispute Resolution

    • Fee Dispute Resolution Home

    Pro Bono

    • Pro Bono Home
    • Pro Bono Reporting
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    Lawyer Referral and Information Services

    • RIS Login
    • Summary of Referral and Information Services Programs
    • Lawyer Referral Service Info and Registration Forms
    • Modest Means Program Registration Forms
    • Military Assistance Panel Training Info and Registration Form
    • Problem Solvers Registration Form
    • Lawyer To Lawyer Registration Form

    (LRAP) Loan Repayment Assistance Program

    • LRAP Home
    • LRAP FAQ
    • LRAP Policies
  • Member Groups

    Sections

    • Section Info/Websites
    • Joining Sections
    • CLE Registration Services
    • Standard Section Bylaws (PDF)
    • Leadership Resources
    • Treasurers Tools

    Committees

    • Home
    • Leadership Resources
    • Professionalism Commission
    • Volunteer Opportunities

    House of Delegates

    • HOD Home
    • HOD Resources
    • Meetings
    • Rules (PDF)
    • Roster (PDF)
    • Staff Contacts

    Board of Governors

    • BOG Home
    • Meetings & Agendas
    • Members
    • Liaisons
    • Committees
    • Resources
    • Task Forces

    Oregon New Lawyers Division

    • ONLD Home
    • Law Students
    • Student Loan Repayment
    • Committees
    • Upcoming Events

    Task Forces and Special Committees

    • Task Forces Home

    Volunteer Bars

    • List/Contacts
    • Leadership Resources

    Volunteering

    • Volunteer Opportunities
  • Licensing/Compliance

    Admissions

    • Admissions Home
    • Alternative Admittance
    • Applicants for Admission
    • Admissions Forms
    • Past Bar Exam Results

    Supervised Practice Portfolio Examination

    • SPPE Home

    Licensed Paralegal Program

    • LP Home

    Lawyer Discipline

    • Discipline Home
    • Disciplinary Board Reporter
    • Disciplinary Boards
    • Client Assistance Office
    • (SPRB) State Professional Responsibility Board

    Membership Records

    • Address Changes
    • Good Standing Certificate
    • Request Discipline File Review

    MCLE

    • MCLE Home
    • Program Database
    • Forms
    • Rules (PDF)

    IOLTA Reporting

    • IOLTA Home
    • IOLTA FAQ

    Licensing Fees

    • Licensing Fee FAQ
    • Licensing Fee Payment

    Status Changes

    • Status Changes FAQ
    • Inactive Status Form
    • Retired Status Form
    • Active Pro Bono Status Form
    • Reinstatement Forms
    • Resignation Form A
    • Pending Reinstatements

    Unlawful Practice of Law

    • UPL Information
    • UPL FAQ

    Pro Hac Vice/Arbitration

    • Pro Hac Vice
    • Arbitration

    New Lawyer Mentoring Program

    • New Lawyer Mentoring Program Home

    Professional Liability Fund

    • Professional Liability
      Fund Website
For The Public

Public Information Home
Legal Information Topics
Oregon Juror Guide
Finding The Right Lawyer
Hiring A Lawyer
Lawyers Fees
Client Assistance Office
Public Records Request
Unlawful Practice of Law
Fee Dispute Resolution
Client Security Fund
Volunteer Opportunities
for the Public

For Members

BarBooks®
Bulletin Archive
Career Center
Fastcase™
Judicial Vacancies
Legal Ethics Opinions
OSB Group Listings
OSB Login
OSB Rules & Regs
SLAC Info
Surveys and Reports
Volunteer Opportunities

CLE/Legal Pubs

CLE Seminars Home
Legal Publications Home

Bar Programs

Diversity & Inclusion
Fee Arbitration/Mediation
Legal Services Program
Legislative/Public Affairs
Loan Repayment
Assistance Program

Oregon Law Foundation
Pro Bono

Member Groups

Board of Governors
Committees
House of Delegates
Volunteer Bars
Oregon New
Lawyers Division

OSB Sections
Professionalism
Commission

Volunteer Opportunities

About The Bar

About the Bar
ADA Notice
Contact Info
Copyright Notice
Directions to the Bar
Meeting Room Rentals
Mission Statement
OSB Job Opportunities
Privacy Policy
Staff Directory
Terms of Use

Licensing/Compliance

Admissions
Client Assistance Office
Client Security Fund
IOLTA Reporting
Lawyer Discipline
MCLE
Member Fee FAQ
New Lawyer
Mentoring Program

Professional Liability Fund
Status Changes

Oregon State Bar Center

Phone: (503) 620-0222
Toll-free in Oregon: (800) 452-8260
Facsimile: (503) 684-1366

Building Location:
16037 SW Upper Boones Ferry Road
Tigard, OR 97224

Mailing Address:
PO Box 231935
Tigard, OR 97281

Oregon State Bar location Map

Copyright ©1997 Oregon State Bar  ®All rights reserved | ADA Notice | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use